Is Your 401(k) Participation Rate Where It Should Be?

Ryan Page |
Categories
401

Is Your 401(k) Participation Rate Where It Should Be?

Chances are, the participation rate on your companies’ 401k plan is not 100%.  But what is the rate exactly, and is it below or above the national average? 

One of the most meaningful ways to evaluate a retirement plan is its participation rate: the percentage of eligible employees who are contributing to the plan. A high participation rate means more employees are taking advantage of the opportunity to save, receive any available employer match, and build toward retirement.

Recent industry data from Vanguard shows that average overall plan participation is around 85%. While that number should not be treated as a universal pass-or-fail standard, it provides a helpful benchmark for employers. If a plan’s participation rate is materially below that level, it may be worth asking why—and whether plan design or employee engagement changes could help.

Why Participation Matters

For employees, it’s fairly straight forward why low participation is a problem.  It means many of them are not taking advantage of opportunity to lower their taxable income, receive matching contributions and have their account compound over time. 

For employers, low participation can also be a sign that the plan is not connecting with the workforce. In some cases, it may contribute to nondiscrimination testing challenges if participation is concentrated among owners or highly compensated employees.

The goal is not simply to increase a number on a report, but to ensure all employees have a solid understanding of the opportunity they have in front of them. 

What Is Considered a Good Participation Rate?

A participation rate that falls well below the national benchmark may indicate an opportunity for improvement. It can be especially important to review participation when:

  • Employees are eligible but not enrolling

  • Employees are contributing too little to receive the full employer match

  • Participation differs significantly by location, age group, or job classification

  • The plan has experienced testing issues

  • New hires are not engaging with the plan

A plan’s participation rate should be reviewed alongside other factors, including average deferral rates, match utilization, employee turnover, eligibility requirements, and whether participants are increasing contributions over time.

Ways Employers Can Improve 401(k) Participation

1. Consider Automatic Enrollment

Automatic enrollment is one of the most effective tools available to employers. Rather than requiring employees to take action to enroll, eligible employees are automatically enrolled at a stated contribution rate unless they choose to opt out.

This approach helps address one of the biggest barriers to participation: inertia. Many employees intend to enroll but postpone the decision, feel unsure about how much to contribute, or simply become overwhelmed by too many choices.

Automatic enrollment has become increasingly common, and research has linked automatic features with stronger overall participation and savings outcomes.

Employers considering automatic enrollment should also evaluate the initial default contribution rate. Starting too low may get employees into the plan, but it may not put them on a strong path toward retirement readiness. A thoughtful default rate, paired with annual increases, can help employees build savings gradually.

2. Add Automatic Escalation

Enrollment is important, but contribution rates matter just as much.

Automatic escalation increases an employee’s contribution rate periodically—often by 1% per year—unless the employee opts out. This allows employees to save more over time without needing to make a new decision every year. 

The thought of contributing 10% of your salary may seem to overwhelming to some, but starting at 5% and increasing every year until 10% is reached? That can be much more digestible. 

3. Make the Employer Match Easy to Understand

An employer match can be a powerful incentive, but employees must understand it in order to value it.

Employees should know:

  • Whether the company offers a match

  • How the match formula works

  • How much they need to contribute to receive the full match

  • Whether there is a vesting schedule

A common issue is that employees contribute to the plan but do not contribute enough to receive the full employer match. This is essentially leaving free money on the table, which they likely wouldn’t do in any other situation. Clear communication can help employees recognize this and motivate them to take full advantage of the employer match. 

4. Provide Ongoing, Practical Employee Education

A single enrollment meeting is rarely enough. Employees have different levels of financial knowledge, different concerns, and different stages of life. A younger employee may be focused on paying off debt, while an employee in their 50s may be worried about whether they have saved enough.

Effective education should be ongoing and practical. It may include group meetings, virtual sessions, one-on-one education opportunities, short videos, email campaigns, and enrollment reminders. 

The best education does not simply explain investment terminology. It helps employees answer practical questions such as:

  • How much should I contribute?

  • Should I contribute enough to receive the match?

  • What is the difference between Roth and pre-tax contributions?

  • What happens if I do not choose investments?

  • How do I increase my contribution rate?

  • What should I do when I receive a raise or bonus?

A financial advisor who works with the plan can play an important role by helping employees understand the plan in plain language and making it easier for them to take action.

5. Simplify the Enrollment Experience

If enrollment requires multiple forms, confusing instructions, or difficult website navigation, participation may suffer.

Employers should periodically review the enrollment process from the employee’s perspective. Is it clear how to enroll? Can employees do it from a phone? Are they receiving timely reminders after becoming eligible? Do they know where to go for help?  Is it easy for them to find out what they’re currently contributing? 

If any of these tasks are too difficult or overwhelming, they may just abandon the whole process. 

6. Review Eligibility and Plan Design

Some participation challenges are driven by plan rules rather than employee disinterest. For example, a long waiting period before employees become eligible may reduce engagement. 

Employees may also be less likely to participate if the plan’s eligibility rules are difficult to understand or if they are not reminded when they become eligible.

Employers should periodically review whether their eligibility provisions, match formula, default contribution rate, and communication strategy align with their workforce and overall benefits goals.

 

Participation Is Only the Beginning

A strong participation rate is an important sign of a healthy 401(k) plan, but it is not the only measure that matters. A plan can have high participation while employees are still contributing too little, missing the full match, or lacking a clear investment strategy.

That is why employers should view participation as part of a broader retirement-readiness conversation. The most effective plans combine thoughtful design, clear communication, automatic features, and ongoing employee education.

For employers whose participation rate is below the national average, the good news is that there are practical steps available. A review of plan data, employee demographics, and current plan features can help identify where participation is breaking down—and which changes may have the greatest impact.

 

If something in your companies' 401(k) seems off and you don't think your employees are getting the education and guidance they need, a 401(k) plan advisor can help.  

Reach out to me directly if you'd like to discuss your 401(k) plan. 

Ryan Page, CFP®, MBA®

Office & Text:720-826-1092

Ryan.Page@lpl.com

Content in this material is for general information only and not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and may not be invested into directly.

This information was developed as a general guide to educate plan sponsors, but is not intended as authoritative guidance or tax or legal advice.  Each plan has unique requirements, and you should consult your attorney or tax advisor for guidance on your specific situation.  In no way does advisor assure that, by using the information provided, plan sponsor will be in compliance with ERISA regulations.